THESE BILLS LOWERING THE COMPULSORY AGE MUST BE OPPOSED
Hyperlinked to help you find the information quickly
HB 754 - This
bill would lower compulsory attendance age from 8 to 6. It would also require
all school districts to establish all-day kindergartens for children between
the ages of 3 and 5 years old, although attendance is not mandatory at this
time.
HB 832 - This bill would
lower the compulsory attendance age from 8 to 6. It would also require all
school districts to establish kindergartens for children at ages to be
determined by the local school board, though attendance would not be mandatory
at this time.
= = = = = = = = = = = =
Reasons why lowering compulsory ages and more pre-school are
not beneficial for Pennsylvania .
Opposition to HB754 and HB832
·
There
are no real educational benefits for young children attending preschool or head
start programs. According to a comprehensive study
(released October 2012) by the Department of Health and Human Services, they
found that “ from the beginning of
Head Start through 3rd grade, the evidence is clear that access to Head Start …
had few impacts on children in kindergarten through 3rd grade.” 1
·
These
types of bills will cost taxpayers millions if not billions of dollars with
little to show for it. The call for whole day pre-kindergarten for 3-5 year
olds, will require schools to hire new teachers as well as provide additional
facilities. A national study concerning early
education pilot programs discovered that fourth grade reading achievement
scores in Oklahoma
have declined. Georgia ’s
program was in place for 13 years before scores caught up to the national
average. The Heritage Foundation determined that despite high state spending,
“neither state has experienced significant, sustained improvement in students’
academic achievement as measured by the National Assessment of Educational
Progress.” 2
·
These
types of bills violate parental rights to direct
their own children’s education. This right is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment
to the U.S. Constitution. The notion that parents are not adequate teachers and
mentors for their children is empirically untrue. As found in a large study in
the United Kingdom, children who are raised (especially at early ages) in their
own homes by their own mothers and fathers fare significantly better developmentally
than those placed in institutional environments at an early age.3
·
Young children are harmed and not
developmentally ready for school. Boys tend to be two years behind in listening, speaking, and writing skills
than girls. Children enrolled in day care are
more likely to exhibit problematic behaviors, such as bullying and aggression,
for several years afterwards.5 Long term vision problems from too much close visual work is
another problem. Children do poorly, loose interest, and
become discouraged by programs that push academics over physical activities.6 Youngsters
need time at home to bond and interact with those closest to them to develop
the trust, brain development, 4 and the social skills that they need to become
healthy individual members of society.
Notes
1. Michael Puma Et Al., Office Of Planning, Research, &
Evaluation, Third Grade Follow-Up To The Head Start Impact Study Final Report:
Executive Summary iv-v (2012) available at
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/head_start_executive_summary.pdf.
2. Lindsay M. Bure, The Heritage Foundation, “Does Universal
Preschool Improve Learning? Lessons from Georgia
and Oklahoma
1” (2009), available at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/05/does-universal-preschool-improve-learning-lessons-from-georgia-and-oklahoma.
3. Yvonne Roberts, “Official:
Babies do Best with Mother,” The Guardian: Observer, October 2, 2005,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/oct/02/childrensservices.familyandrelationships.
4. Dr. Karyn Purvis is the Director of the Institute of Child
Development at Texas Christian University (TCU) in Fort Worth , Texas .
5. “Early
Child Care Linked to Increases in Vocabulary, Some Problem Behaviors in Fifth
and Sixth Grades.” National Institute
of Child Health and Human
Development (NICHD). NIH News.
26 March 2007. http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/mar2007/nichd-26.htm
6. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/katie-hurley/5-reasons-the-common-core-is-ruining-childhood-_b_4153698.html and http://www.learningfirst.org/cutting-physical-education-and-recess-troubling-trends-and-how-you-can-help
Much of this information can be found on the Home School Legal Defense
Association website:
http://www.hslda.org/docs/nche/Issues/S/State_Early_Education.asp
Compiled by
Mark Moore, CHAP Legislative Coordinator
No comments:
Post a Comment